Sample report — Comal County, Texas

See exactly what's in a Parcel Pre-Screen Report before you order.

Format, status language, red-flag framing, source citation, and the buyer questions a paid report includes. Start here if you want to see the format, source framing, and limits before ordering the paid report. Sample report = proof and format preview. Free checker = quick first pass. Paid report = parcel-specific pre-screen when you are close to an offer. Screening-grade public-source review — not legal advice.

Sample preview

Parcel Pre-Screen Report

Start here if you want to see the format, source framing, and limits before ordering the paid report. Sample report = proof and format preview. Free checker = quick first pass. Parcel Pre-Screen Report = source-cited parcel-specific pre-screen when you are close to an offer.

  • County Comal County, Texas
  • Sample report Proof and format preview
  • Free checker Quick first pass on obvious public-source questions
  • Paid report Parcel-specific pre-screen when you are serious and close to an offer

Sample report proof

This is what a Parcel Pre-Screen Report looks like.

A real report is tied to one parcel. It shows public-source signals, what we were able to match, what still needs checking, and the next questions to ask before you spend more money.

Example only

Parcel match

This sample data is for illustration only. A real report is tied to one parcel.

Field Example Why it matters
Parcel / APN 123-456-789 Ties the report to one parcel
County Example County, TX County rules and source paths vary
Approx. acreage 5.2 acres Lot size can affect use, septic, access, and setbacks
Source tie Tied together from county parcel viewer and listing details Shows which records were used to identify the parcel

Source strip

Public sources used for the first pass

These are the public source paths we checked first.

County parcel viewerCounty zoning / planning pageFEMA flood mapNRCS soil surveyWetlands screening sourceUtility / broadband sourcePermit/document lookup where available

Likely concern overview

Likely concern overview

This is a screening read on public-source signals, not a land-use decision.

What the sample surfaced

What the sample surfaced

  • The sample could be tied to a county parcel record.
  • Public maps provided initial zoning, flood, soil, and utility or broadband clues.
  • Several important questions could be turned into specific county or professional verification steps.

What still needs checking

What still needs checking

  • Legal access
  • Buildability outcome
  • Permit outcome
  • Septic outcome
  • Utility service availability
  • Wetland jurisdiction
  • Title position
  • Survey boundary accuracy
  • Engineering feasibility

Next-step checklist

Next-step checklist

  • Ask planning: Is my intended use allowed on this parcel?
  • Ask title and survey: How is legal access documented?
  • Ask septic or health: What is required for septic review?
  • Ask providers: Can you serve this specific parcel?
  • Ask permitting: Are there existing permits, violations, or document gaps tied to this APN or address?

LandCheck is a public-source pre-screen. It is not legal advice, a survey, title opinion, engineering review, septic determination, wetland determination, utility confirmation, or permit decision.

Category Public-source signal What it may mean What to check next
Access Road visible near parcel, legal access not settled A visible road is not the same as documented legal access Ask title, surveyor, or county how access is documented
Zoning / use Rural residential zoning appears likely from public map Your intended use may be possible, but local rules control details Ask the planning office if your specific use is allowed
Flood / wetlands No obvious flood overlap in the public map; wetlands source still needs follow-up Public screening is helpful, not an environmental determination Confirm with the right local or federal authority if building near drainage or low areas
Soils / septic Soil data shows conditions that may require review Septic feasibility cannot be resolved from desktop data Ask the county health or septic office, or a licensed septic professional
Utilities / broadband Provider data appears mixed or incomplete Service may exist nearby but still requires provider confirmation Ask providers for parcel-specific availability
Permit / documents No obvious recent permit record found in a quick public lookup Missing public records do not prove no permits or no issues Ask the county permitting office for records tied to the APN or address

Pricing detail

What you get for $149

The Parcel Pre-Screen Report is a source-backed first pass for one parcel. It is built to show what public records suggest, what is still unknown, and what to verify next before you spend more money.

Deliverables

  • Parcel match summary tied to the address, APN, listing, or county record.
  • Public-source review notes for access, zoning or use, flood, soils or septic, utilities or broadband, and permit or document gaps where available.
  • Likely concern overview written in screening-safe language, not a parcel conclusion.
  • What we could verify from public sources.
  • What we could not verify from public sources.
  • Plain-English next-step checklist for the county, title or survey, septic or health, utility providers, permitting office, or qualified professionals.
  • Source appendix or source references where available.

Limits

  • Not legal advice.
  • Not a survey or title opinion.
  • Not an engineering review or septic approval.
  • Not a wetland determination or utility guarantee.
  • Not a permit approval or parcel-level land-use conclusion.

How to read this page

Sample report, free checker, and paid report each do a different job.

The sample report shows the format and proof structure. The free checker is a quick first pass. The paid Parcel Pre-Screen Report is the parcel-specific source-backed option when you are close to an offer.

This sample is not tied to a real APN, address, listing URL, survey, title commitment, seller packet, or parcel boundary.

Start here

Top 5 things to verify before offer

  1. OSSF/septic authority and records
  2. Floodplain and drainage review
  3. Edwards Aquifer relevance
  4. Recorded access and practical road/driveway path
  5. Restrictions, jurisdiction, and water/well path

Red-flag dashboard

Each finding cites the source path and the next verification step.

Needs verification

Comal County OSSF sources, TCEQ OSSF guidance, and local permit workflow

  • What we found Comal County has a defined OSSF/septic process, but parcel-specific records are needed.
  • Why it matters Wastewater can be one of the biggest rural land constraints.
  • Next step Ask the county who handles OSSF review for the parcel and request any prior records.
  • Source County OSSF sources and TCEQ OSSF guidance
  • Confidence High for source path, low to medium for parcel-specific risk

Needs verification

County floodplain sources and FEMA context

  • What we found Floodplain review exists, but parcel-specific risk cannot be concluded from the sample.
  • Why it matters Flood context can affect use, cost, timing, and offer terms.
  • Next step Check the parcel in FEMA and ask whether any intended improvement area triggers review.
  • Source Comal County floodplain sources and FEMA Map Service Center
  • Confidence High for source path, low to medium for parcel-specific risk

Unknown from public data

Wetlands and water-feature screening layers

  • What we found The sample does not have parcel coordinates, so a parcel-level wetland conclusion is not available.
  • Why it matters Mapped or possible wetland or drainage features may reduce usable site area.
  • Next step Check NWI once coordinates are known and seek professional review if needed.
  • Source USFWS National Wetlands Inventory
  • Confidence Low

Unknown from public data

Access, road frontage, and driveway questions

  • What we found County maps and records can guide the review, but they do not prove recorded legal access.
  • Why it matters Access can make or break a rural land purchase.
  • Next step Ask for recorded access documents, easements, plats, and road maintenance details.
  • Source County road, driveway, addressing, and clerk record paths
  • Confidence Low

Seller questions

  1. Has this parcel had any site evaluation, soil review, OSSF/septic permit application, inspection, denial, repair, or design work?
  2. Is there recorded legal access to the parcel?
  3. Are there deed restrictions, covenants, subdivision restrictions, POA/HOA rules, private road agreements, utility easements, or special district rules?
  4. Has any part of the property been identified as floodplain, drainage area, creek, wetland, steep terrain, or Edwards Aquifer regulated area?

Local authority questions

  • Who handles OSSF review for this parcel?
  • Does the parcel or intended homesite trigger floodplain review?
  • Would a driveway, culvert, address, or utility road crossing permit be needed?
  • Are there recorded plats, easements, restrictions, covenants, or other documents a buyer should review?

Source appendix

County floodplain

Comal County Floodplain

  • Helps with Floodplain permit and administrator context
  • Confidence High
  • Reviewed 2026-05-21

Next step

Use the sample to decide whether the report fits your purchase stage.

Order the source-cited Parcel Pre-Screen Report when you are close to making an offer, or route a Texas parcel to the right local authority first.